Which situation does NOT justify the use of remote services?

The situation that does not justify the use of remote services revolves around a lack of sufficient information about the client. In professional practice, especially in fields such as therapy or counseling, having adequate information about a client is crucial for providing effective and ethical care. It is essential to understand a client's needs, history, and circumstances before engaging in any form of treatment, including remote services.

Utilizing remote services without sufficient information can lead to misunderstandings, inadequate assessments, and potentially harmful outcomes. This lack of understanding could compromise the therapeutic process and the client's well-being, as appropriate interventions cannot be determined without comprehensive information.

In contrast, other situations like having an existing therapy relationship, the inaccessibility of in-person treatment, and the practical advantages of remote sessions all provide valid grounds for utilizing remote services. When there is a pre-established therapeutic rapport, or when clients cannot access in-person treatment due to geographical or physical barriers, remote services can be beneficial. Similarly, practical advantages, such as convenience and flexibility for both the provider and the client, bolster the case for remote service usage.