What type of boundary application can negatively impact the therapeutic relationship?

Rigid risk-avoidance boundaries can negatively impact the therapeutic relationship because they prevent the development of a meaningful connection between the therapist and the client. When boundaries are overly strict and inflexible, it can create an environment where clients feel distanced or unsupported. This rigidity may inhibit open communication, as clients might feel that they cannot share certain thoughts or feelings without risking boundary violations.

In contrast, boundaries that are too lenient or easy-going may foster a sense of safety and rapport; however, they can also lead to confusion about the professional relationship. The slippery slope phenomenon refers to a gradual erosion of professional boundaries, which can compromise the integrity of the therapeutic process, but is different from the immediate consequences of rigid risk-avoidance. Hence, while all boundary styles play a role in how the therapeutic relationship is experienced, rigid risk-avoidance is particularly detrimental because it restricts the necessary engagement and trust needed for effective therapy.